DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Sound (Art and Technology)

Lorenz Schwarz
Karlsruhe University of Arts and Design (HfG)

Summer Semester 2024
Course info

← Overview


center Page from the 1854 first edition of Walden listing the itemised cost of Thoreau's house, totalling just over 28 dollars

DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Walden; or, Life in the Woods

Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862),
published in 1854

  • Emphasizing simplicity and self-sufficiency
  • Turning away from industrialized mass society
  • Insights for modern DIY philosophy
DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

From self-sufficiency to counterculture

DIY evolved from practical necessity to philosophical stance:

  • 1940s–50s: Post-war home improvement boom (returning soldiers, suburban expansion)
  • 1960s: Counterculture reframes DIY as anti-establishment practice
  • 1970s–80s: Punk DIY ethics ("anyone can do it")
  • 2000s: Maker movement merges craft with digital fabrication
DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Do-It-Yourself (DIY)

Documented in Suburban Life magazine in 1912, do it yourself describes practical work undertaken without professional services:

  • self-reliance in rural and domestic life
  • repair and reuse of available materials
  • independent learning through practical experience
DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Professional craft and DIY

In home improvement, German distinguishes Handwerker and Heimwerker:

  • Craftsperson (Handwerker): trained professional offering skilled services
  • DIY practitioner (Heimwerker): non-professional working independently for personal use
DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Maker movement and infrastructure

Since the 2000s, maker culture has connected DIY practice with digital fabrication:

  • shared workshops: hackerspaces, makerspaces and Fab Labs
  • accessible platforms: Arduino, Raspberry Pi and similar development boards
  • networked knowledge: project documentation, repositories and online communities

The Fab Lab network emerged from MIT’s Center for Bits and Atoms in the early 2000s.

DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Open hardware and maker ecosystem


Platforms and resources

  • Arduino and compatible boards
  • Raspberry Pi and Teensy
  • shared schematics, firmware and libraries

Suppliers and media

  • Adafruit and SparkFun
  • Seeed Studio and DFRobot
  • Make: magazine
DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Reasons for making

  • Creative expression and leisure
  • Learning and technical autonomy
  • Cost savings, repair and resource efficiency
  • Environmental responsibility
DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

DIY as social critique

Since the 1960s, DIY has also expressed:

  • resistance to mass consumption and corporate control
  • active examination and appropriation of technology
  • alternatives to closed and standardized products
DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Do It Together (DIT)

DIT shifts DIY from individual production to collaborative learning and construction:

  • share knowledge rather than proprietary secrets
  • solve technical problems collectively
  • broaden access to tools and practical education

Examples: repair cafés, tool libraries, makerspaces, open-source communities and music collectives

DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

How-To

DIY knowledge is shared through instructions and project documentation:

  • Making-of accounts: reflect on processes, problems and solutions
  • Magazines and online platforms: make practical knowledge accessible
DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

DIY online

The internet turns practical knowledge into reusable instructions:

  • Project documentation: Instructables and specialist blogs
  • Discussion communities: forums and Reddit
  • Video demonstrations: YouTube
  • Open repositories: GitHub
DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

DIY in musical practice

Artists build, modify and repurpose instruments when existing technologies do not provide the required sounds or forms of interaction:

  • Build: custom instruments and circuits (Mumma, Tudor)
  • Prepare: conventional instruments and playing mechanisms (Cage)
  • Hack: commercial electronics through circuit modification

Technical construction becomes a source of musical form and aesthetic identity.

Prepared pianos, Donaueschingen, 1954 · Photo: Willy Pragher · CC BY 4.0
DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Extended techniques

DIY approaches expand acoustic instruments beyond their conventional design:

  • prepare or modify instruments to alter resonance and timbre
  • build alternative interfaces and playing mechanisms
  • use amplification, contact microphones and found materials
DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Subverting technology

DIY electronics treats technology as material rather than as a finished product:

  • Deconstruct: Open devices to understand how they behave.
  • Repurpose: Use components beyond their intended function.
  • Circuit-bend: Introduce new connections and discover unintended sounds.

The objective is not only repair, but new behaviour.

DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Process as composition

Construction defines a system rather than a fixed sonic result:

  • material intervention: objects, instruments and circuits become playable
  • open conditions: scores and setups frame actions without fixing every sound
  • performance systems: technology, performer and acoustic space interact

Connecting, testing and listening become part of composing.

Video excerpt:

John Cage and David Tudor

Musik im technischen Zeitalter (1963)

▶ Watch online (external link)

DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

DIY pioneers in experimental music

  • Sonic Arts Union: Robert Ashley, David Behrman, Alvin Lucier and Gordon Mumma developed portable, individually constructed electronic systems. Mumma described his adaptive live-electronic approach as Cybersonics.

  • Experiments in Art and Technology (E.A.T., founded 1966): brought artists including John Cage, David Tudor and Robert Rauschenberg into collaboration with engineers and emerging technologies.

DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Rainforest IV (1973)

Rainforest IV is an immersive performance-installation by David Tudor in which repurposed objects function as resonant “instrumental loudspeakers,” creating a spatial sound environment.

center

Video excerpt:

David Tudor: Rainforest IV

From re: Soundings (1983) by Kit Fitzgerald and John Sanborn

▶ Watch online (external link)

DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Crackle Box (Michel Waisvisz)

Developed by Michel Waisvisz at STEIM in the mid-1970s, the Crackle Box transforms the deliberate misuse of electronic technology into a playable instrument:

  • the performer’s skin becomes part of the circuit
  • touch and pressure produce unstable electronic sounds
  • a simple circuit enables direct musical interaction

Circuit diagram of the Crackle Box

Crackle Box · Photo: Till Kniola · CC BY 4.0
DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Circuit bending and hardware hacking

Circuit bending, associated with Reed Ghazala, opens battery-powered sound toys through exploratory short-circuiting:

  • discover connections by listening rather than following a fixed schematic
  • make the results playable with switches, controls or body contacts
  • treat consumer devices as open systems rather than sealed “black boxes”

Safety: use only low-voltage, battery-powered devices—never mains-powered equipment.

DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

DIY electronics as artistic practice

Nicolas Collins

  • connects hardware hacking with experimental composition in Handmade Electronic Music
  • teaches practical circuit-hacking workshops

John Richards / Dirty Electronics

  • develops participatory instruments through collective making
  • critiques consumer-oriented maker culture through “beyond DIY”
DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Victorian Synthesizer (John Bowers)

Scraping the rod across the file rapidly opens and closes the circuit.


center Victorian Synthesizer

<

Photo: Fangchao Bi · CC BY 4.0
DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Logic chips for sound creation

CMOS logic chips can turn binary switching signals into audible patterns:

  • generate square waves
  • gate, divide, and combine signals
  • create rhythmic sequences

These instruments are often called Lunetta synthesizers, after Stanley Lunetta (1937–2016).

CMOS logic chips used for experimental sound generation

DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Lunetta synthesizers

Lunetta synthesizers use simple CMOS logic to create custom instruments:

  • low-cost, widely available components
  • immediate results from simple circuits
  • tactile controls that encourage experimentation
  • designs that remain open to modification

From schematic to breadboard to sound

center Three stages side by side: a circuit schematic, the same circuit built on a breadboard, and a loudspeaker producing sound

Generating sound with three components

center Schmitt-trigger inverter with feedback resistor and capacitor, showing the capacitor waveform

An inverting Schmitt trigger becomes an oscillator with only a resistor and a capacitor.

DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Logic gates as equivalent switching circuits

A logic gate maps one or more binary inputs to a binary output. Its truth table defines it completely. Simple on/off switches, open (0) or closed (1), can implement the basic logic operations:

  • AND: switches in series, both must be closed (1) for the LED to light
  • OR: switches in parallel, either switch closed (1) lights the LED
  • NOT (inverter): a switch in parallel with the LED, closed (1) bypasses the LED and turns it off (0)

Interactive demonstration: logic gates ↗

DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

From oscillator to instrument

A simple oscillator produces a square wave. Additional CMOS logic transforms its signal into more complex sounds and temporal structures:

  • logic gates shape, gate, and combine signals
  • dividers and counters create subharmonics and pulse patterns
  • selectors and sequencers route signals into repeating structures

Circuitry-Based Sound — circuits and workshop documentation ↗

Circuitry-Based Sound, 2023 · Photo: Hoin Ji · CC BY 4.0
DIY Aesthetics and Practices in Electronic Music

Proto-instrument

Instrument building is an evolving artistic practice that blurs making, playing and composing:

  • building becomes part of artistic expression and performance
  • musical and aesthetic decisions emerge as the instrument develops
Video excerpt:

Circuitry-Based Sound

Group performance by course participants, 2025

▶ Watch course documentation (external link)

Literature

  • Collins, Nicolas. Handmade Electronic Music: The Art of Hardware Hacking. Routledge, 2020.

  • Ghazala, Reed. Circuit-Bending: Build Your Own Alien Instruments. Wiley, 2005.

  • Gold, Helmut, Annabelle Hornung, Verena Kuni, and Tine Nowak, editors. DIY: Die Mitmach-Revolution. Ventil Verlag, 2011.

  • Richards, John. “Beyond DIY in Electronic Music.” Organised Sound, vol. 18, no. 3, 2013, pp. 274–281, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355771813000241.

  • Richards, John. “DIY and Maker Communities in Electronic Music.” The Cambridge Companion to Electronic Music, 2017, pp. 238–257, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316459874.015.

Literature

  • Richards, John. “Getting the Hands Dirty.” Leonardo Music Journal, vol. 18, 2008, pp. 25–31, https://doi.org/10.1162/lmj.2008.18.25.

  • Kori, Lisa, and David Novak. “Handmade Sound Communities.” Handmade Electronic Music, 2020, pp. 393–405, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429264818-42.

  • Ashley, Robert. “Gordon Mumma: ‘I’m Using the By-Product of My Culture.’” Music with Roots in the Aether: Interviews with and Essays about Seven American Composers. Edition MusikTexte, 2000, pp. 99–108.

  • Sipos, Regina, and Kerstin Franzl. “Tracing the History of DIY and Maker Culture in Germany’s Open Workshops.” Digital Culture & Society, vol. 6, no. 1, 2020, pp. 109–120, https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2020-0106.

Websites

Third-party materials

These notices cover third-party assets reproduced locally. Original course material is covered by the course CC BY 4.0 licence.

Public-domain and source-based material

  • Henry David Thoreau, Walden; or, Life in the Woods (Boston: Ticknor and Fields, 1854), p. 54 — itemised house-cost table from “Economy”; Boston Public Library, digitized by the Internet Archive; public domain; vector reconstruction by Lorenz Schwarz

Third-party materials II

Material licensed under CC BY 4.0

  • Prepared pianos, Donaueschinger Musiktage, 17 October 1954 — photograph by Willy Pragher; Landesarchiv Baden-Württemberg, Staatsarchiv Freiburg, W 134 Nr. 039530a
  • Crackle Box — photograph by Till Kniola, 2021
  • "Victorian Synthesizer" demonstration — photograph by Fangchao Bi
  • Performance at ZKM, 2021 — photograph by Dr. Paul Modler
  • Circuit Bending Workshop — photograph by Dr. Paul Modler
  • From schematic to breadboard to sound — illustration by Yunfei Zhang, 2025
  • Circuitry-Based Sound, 2023 — photograph by Hoin Ji

© 2026 Lorenz Schwarz

Original text, diagrams, illustrations, photographs, audio, and video are licensed under CC BY 4.0, except where otherwise noted.

Third-party material: See the preceding rights notices.

Contact: lschwarz@hfg-karlsruhe.de

← Overview